De ce a fost ales Obama?

” Barack Obama va intra în istorie ca primul preşedinte evreu al Americii „. Abner Mikva (evreu)

Fostul Consilier al Casei Albe, in Administraţia Clinton

 (Chicago Tribune, 12 decembrie 2008)

Barack Obama a castigat 52.9 la sută din voturi în alegerile prezidenţiale. Dar nu de asta este el preşedinte al Statelor Unite. El stă în Casa Albă pentru un singur motiv şi numai unul: Barack Obama a fost alegerea lui Rothschild.

 Şi mai surprinzător este obiectivul care i-a fost atribuit omulului lui Rothschild, de către „căpeteniile ”  Illuminati, pentru a-l duce la bun sfarsit. Acest obiectiv nu este nimic altceva decât desfiinţarea sistematică şi distrugerea Americii şi ocuparea ei de către Mafia evreiasca existenta. Barack Obama a fost ales pentru a deveni primul lider al unei Noi Ordini Mondiale trasata  de evrei.

Loto-ul american prezidenţial este un spectacol impresionant. Sute de milioane de dolari sunt cheltuite de către candidaţii care concurează cu înverşunare pe TV, internet, prin direct mail, precum şi pentru impresionarea  inimilor şi minţilor alegătorilor americani. Milioane de cuvinte şi imagini sunt audiate, văzut şi dezbătute. Problemele de contencios sunt puternic discutate.

 În cele din urmă, in a doua zi de marţi, din noiembrie, milioane de oameni merg la vot şi isi distribuie cu mândrie buletinele de vot cu exprimarea lor. Si iata! Cetăţenii SUA si-au ales în mod liber noul lor Preşedinte care va ocupa Casa Albă.

La fel s-a întâmplat doar si în 2008, nu ?  Şi pe jumatate  alb / negrul născut în Hawaii numit  H. Barack Obama a câştigat-Bine, nu-i asa? Dumnezeu să binecuvânteze democraţia şi stilul american.  Toti se închina in fata ” selectiei ”  poporului, nu?

 Barack Obama: Alegerea lui Rothschild

Ei bine, dragi prieteni … aşteptaţi doar un minut.  Am niste vesti foarte îngrijorătoare pentru voi.  Ce credeţi că aţi văzut, în 2008, în cursul acelui an electoral ciudat şi tumultuos a fost, de fapt, departe de ceea ce s-a întâmplat cu adevărat în spatele scenei.

  A fost H. Barack Obama ,cu adevarat, alegerea Americii?  A câştigat el pe merit, în conformitate cu consensul electoratului? Titlul celui mai nou film al meu deţine surprinzătorul răspuns la această întrebare foarte importanta: alegerea  lui Rothschild: Barack Obama şi intrigile ascunse în spatele complotului pentru Uciderea Americii (Disponibil pe DVD numai).

Cele nouăzeci de minute de documentaţie din acest film dezvăluie modul în care un singur om, şi  numai un singur om, în 2008, a ales noul preşedinte al Americii. Iar aceasta alegere a fost făcută cu mult timp înainte ca americanii sa fii auzit vreodată chiar şi intamplator remarcabilul nume, „Barack Obama.” Da, Obama a fost  alegerea lui Rothschild.

Mladita dinastiei de azi a Rothschild-zilor

king_tut_mask” Când Preşedintele Obama a vizitat Egiptul, oamenii de acolo l-au salutat ca pe noul „Tutankhamon, Faraonul Egiptului.

obama_on_time_coverUimitor, această coperta a revistei ” Time ” a fost în mod clar destinata să promoveze aceeaşi idee-un exemplu in plus al spiritului lui Rothschild-inclinatia spre tehnici de control psihologic”.

Domnul Jacob Rothschild este al patrulea baron Rothschild şi stapaneste un vast imperiu în calitate de şef actual al celei mai ilustre familii ereditare(l pe linie de sânge )de pe planetă. Cine sunt Rothschild-zii? Puţini americani ştiu de puterea teribila şi influenţa acestei dinastii de evrei bogaţi. Dar credeti-mă, liderii din această lume ştiu de Jacob Rothschild şi rudele lui.

 Politicienii ca Hillary Clinton, Colin Powell, John McCain, Nancy Pelosi, şi, da, Barack Obama tremura de frica atunci când numele de „Rothschild” este  menţionat chiar si în trecere.

 Puterea lui Rothschild este mai mare decât influenţa şi autoritatea combinata a  partidelor Democrat şi Republican.  Scutul rosu, creasta FamilieiRothschild, deţine stapanirea peste toate naţiunile din Europa şi de multe ori un guvern a fost răsturnat doar pentru că un Rothschild a fost nemulţumit de performanţa sa. Wall Street din New York si „London’s City” umile  districte financiare asculta  de instrucţiunile  Rothschild „, precum şi monedele naţionale, alternativ, scad sau cresc în valoare, în funcţie de dorinta lor. Aşa cum este scris în Apocalipsa 18:3-” Pentru că din vinul aprinderii desfrânării ei au băut toate neamurile şi împăraţii pământului s-au desfrânat cu ea şi neguţătorii lumii din mulţimea desfătărilor ei s-au îmbogăţit”…

 Barack Obama, Primul Preşedinte Evreu al Americii

 Rothschild-zii, mai presus de orice altceva, sunt evrei sionişti. Complotul ascuns, condus de Rothschild, întotdeauna  face, fiti siguri, ca un om politic sionist- fie el democrat sau republican-sa depuna jurământul în calitate de preşedinte al celei mai mari super-puteri din lume. Ultimul Preşedinte al Statelor Unite care a incalcat aceasta regula de bază a fost Richard M. Nixon, a carui însufleţita rebeliune  împotriva facţiunii evreiesti Rothschild  a Americii a fost de scurtă durată şi tragică în decesul acestuia.

Misterioasa Apariţie a lui Barack Obama ca un superstar politic a fost nici NOROC, nici invapaiere de o clipa. Obama a fost cu meticulozitate crescut şi format de tanar pentru a deveni-ai priceput! – Primul Presedinte Evreu al Americii. Sa indraznesc sa repet?—Barack Obama este primul preşedinte evreu al Americii. Nu, nu prin ADN, nu după fire, dar, indiferent, un evreu sionist; şi partea de evreu este atât de înrădăcinată în natura sa astfel incat cel mai influent miliardar evreu Illuminati din lume, il considera drept un sionist devotat in care se poate avea încredere.  Obama,  spun evreii, „are un suflet evreiesc.”  Obama este evreu ” în intestine lui”, spune un om politic evreu de top.

Barack Obama, un comunist  indrumat de către un pervers Homosexual

 Acum, comunismul este evreiesc, iar Obama este, de asemenea, un comunist cu blana vopsita. Istoria confirmă faptul că sefii Miscarii Terorii Roşii şi agitatorii-Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin şi Leon Trotsky-au fost  din punct de vedere ideologic comunisti. Dar mult mai important, acesti arhitecţi ai extremei socialismului -au fost şi acest lucru este esenţialevrei. Evrei ca rasă, evrei ca si conduită şi obiective. Deci, de asemenea, Barack Obama este atât comunist cat si evreu, Evreismul lui fiind o chestiune de spiritualitate, ambitie si afilieri.

 Aşa cum am aratat in noul meu film, mama alba a lui Barack Obama a fost un comunista, bunicii sai albi au fost comunişti şi barbatul negru care l-a instruit in tinerete, Frank Marshall Davis, a fost, de asemenea, un comunist. Davis a fost, de altfel, un pervertit, un cap al bisexualilor si drogurilor şi un rasist prefăcut.  Davis, care a devenit un tată pentru tanarul  Barack , odată  a scris o carte despre întunecatele sale ispravi sexuale. El s-a lăudat cu ” partide ” de sex-nebun cu femei albe şi de a fi avut  partide de sex in grup cu depravatele femei albe. Legăturile sale neobişnuite, ca mentor si profesor, cu Barack Obama sunt revelate în video meu.

In Chicago, cei mai apropiati asociati ai lui Obama au fost, şi sunt si astăzi, comunişti.  Aproape toti sunt evrei, şi cei mai multi dintre ei sunt homosexuali. Într-adevăr, viaţa lui Barack Obama, in ansamblu a fost o groapă de gunoi şi sordidă saga de instruire comunista, filosofie sionista, intens pervertita pedereastie homosexuala, fervent anti-americanism şi o „Ura fata de Albi” formă a rasismului negru. Ce avem aici este  un Presedinte a carui  ordine de zi este străina de Constituţia noastră, un om credincios scopurilor marxiste şi unei Poliţii de stat sioniste.

O gamă infricosatoare de evrei radicali şi agenti sionisti

In jurul lui Obama, la Casa Alba şi în Washington, DC exista un tablou înspăimântător de evrei radicali şi agenţi sionisti de influenţă.  Controlori evrei, inclusiv seful de stat major al Casei Albe- Rahm Emanuel şi consilierul şef politic- David Axelrod-il monitorizeaza şi ghideaza pe Obama în lucrarea sa de distrugere. Behind them all is a hidden cabal led by the powerful Rothschild family. In spatele tuturor este o clica ascunsa condusa de  puternica familie Rothschild. Preşedintele Obama şi Congresul nostru laş, le-au dat deja acoliţilor lui Rothschild, de pe Wall Street, peste şaisprezece bilioane de dolari în înşelătoria in curs de desfăşurare , numita „recesiune economică”.  Bogăţia noastră naţională a fost jefuită de acesti nebuni şi ei vor mai mult,  încă. Cu alegerea lui Rothschild, Barack Obama H., stand in foisorul puterii lumii, ei intenţionează să ia tot. Şi cine-i poate impiedica, eventual, de la atingerea scopurilor lor sinistre?

 Prosperitatea Americii este în haine vechi;  Constituţia noastra, libertatile si drepturile noastre garantate, şi tot ceea ce noi şi strămoşii noştri au creat şi-au murit pentru asta-sunt acum in pericol mare.  Suntem agăţati de un fir de păianjen subţire, ultimele rămăşiţe ale patrimoniului nostru american şi ale modului nostru de viaţă. Le vom permite Rothschild-zilor, clicii sale ascunse şi alesului sau, Preşedintele Barack Obama, sa rupa acest unic, zdrenţuit fir şi să pună capăt naţiunii care, odată, a fost un far de lumina al civilizaţiei occidentale şi a întregii lumi?

Rugăciunea mea arzătoare este ca, cu ajutorul lui Dumnezeu, sa ne adunam curajul noastru interior şi, indiferent de costuri,sa ne ridicam cu curaj impotriva tiraniei şi să facemă o ultima baricada pentru adevăr şi dreptate. Nu avem prea mult timp. Aşa cum Isus a spus, noi trebuie să lucram acum ” până este ziuă[…]; că vine noaptea, când nimeni nu poate să lucreze.(Ioan 9:4)www.texemarrs.com/rothschilds_choice_article.htm 

14 thoughts on “De ce a fost ales Obama?

    • Bine ,mă isteţule !
      Acu’ vino şi cu traducerea, că nu toţi cunoaştem în România*măreaţa limbă şi cultură rusă* ! !

  1. Pingback: SUA se va DEZMEMBRA in 2010 « Mucenicul’s Blog

  2. The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution
    and Russia’s Early Soviet Regime

    Assessing the Grim Legacy of Soviet Communism

    by Mark Weber
    In the night of July 16-17, 1918, a squad of Bolshevik secret police murdered Russia’s last emperor, Tsar Nicholas II, along with his wife, Tsaritsa Alexandra, their 14-year-old son, Tsarevich Alexis, and their four daughters. They were cut down in a hail of gunfire in a half-cellar room of the house in Ekaterinburg, a city in the Ural mountain region, where they were being held prisoner. The daughters were finished off with bayonets. To prevent a cult for the dead Tsar, the bodies were carted away to the countryside and hastily buried in a secret grave.Bolshevik authorities at first reported that the Romanov emperor had been shot after the discovery of a plot to liberate him. For some time the deaths of the Empress and the children were kept secret. Soviet historians claimed for many years that local Bolsheviks had acted on their own in carrying out the killings, and that Lenin, founder of the Soviet state, had nothing to do with the crime.In 1990, Moscow playwright and historian Edvard Radzinsky announced the result of his detailed investigation into the murders. He unearthed the reminiscences of Lenin’s bodyguard, Alexei Akimov, who recounted how he personally delivered Lenin’s execution order to the telegraph office. The telegram was also signed by Soviet government chief Yakov Sverdlov. Akimov had saved the original telegraph tape as a record of the secret order.1Radzinsky’s research confirmed what earlier evidence had already indicated. Leon Trotsky – one of Lenin’s closest colleagues – had revealed years earlier that Lenin and Sverdlov had together made the decision to put the Tsar and his family to death. Recalling a conversation in 1918, Trotsky wrote:2My next visit to Moscow took place after the [temporary] fall of Ekaterinburg [to anti-Communist forces]. Speaking with Sverdlov, I asked in passing: „Oh yes, and where is the Tsar?”
    „Finished,” he replied. „He has been shot.”
    „And where is the family?”
    „The family along with him.”
    „All of them?,” I asked, apparently with a trace of surprise.
    „All of them,” replied Sverdlov. „What about it?” He was waiting to see my reaction. I made no reply.
    „And who made the decision?,” I asked.
    „We decided it here. Ilyich [Lenin] believed that we shouldn’t leave the Whites a live banner to rally around, especially under the present difficult circumstances.”
    I asked no further questions and considered the matter closed.
    Recent research and investigation by Radzinsky and others also corroborates the account provided years earlier by Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times in Russia for 17 years. His account, The Last Days of the Romanovs – originally published in 1920, and reissued in 1993 by the Institute for Historical Review – is based in large part on the findings of a detailed investigation carried out in 1919 by Nikolai Sokolov under the authority of „White” (anti-Communist) leader Alexander Kolchak. Wilton’s book remains one of the most accurate and complete accounts of the murder of Russia’s imperial family.3A solid understanding of history has long been the best guide to comprehending the present and anticipating the future. Accordingly, people are most interested in historical questions during times of crisis, when the future seems most uncertain. With the collapse of Communist rule in the Soviet Union, 1989-1991, and as Russians struggle to build a new order on the ruins of the old, historical issues have become very topical. For example, many ask: How did the Bolsheviks, a small movement guided by the teachings of German-Jewish social philosopher Karl Marx, succeed in taking control of Russia and imposing a cruel and despotic regime on its people?In recent years, Jews around the world have been voicing anxious concern over the specter of anti-Semitism in the lands of the former Soviet Union. In this new and uncertain era, we are told, suppressed feelings of hatred and rage against Jews are once again being expressed. According to one public opinion survey conducted in 1991, for example, most Russians wanted all Jews to leave the country.4 But precisely why is anti-Jewish sentiment so widespread among the peoples of the former Soviet Union? Why do so many Russians, Ukrainians, Lithuanians and others blame „the Jews” for so much misfortune?
    A Taboo Subject
    Although officially Jews have never made up more than five percent of the country’s total population,5 they played a highly disproportionate and probably decisive role in the infant Bolshevik regime, effectively dominating the Soviet government during its early years. Soviet historians, along with most of their colleagues in the West, for decades preferred to ignore this subject. The facts, though, cannot be denied.With the notable exception of Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), most of the leading Communists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews. Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) headed the Red Army and, for a time, was chief of Soviet foreign affairs. Yakov Sverdlov (Solomon) was both the Bolshevik party’s executive secretary and – as chairman of the Central Executive Committee – head of the Soviet government. Grigori Zinoviev (Radomyslsky) headed the Communist International (Comintern), the central agency for spreading revolution in foreign countries. Other prominent Jews included press commissar Karl Radek (Sobelsohn), foreign affairs commissar Maxim Litvinov (Wallach), Lev Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Moisei Uritsky.6Lenin himself was of mostly Russian and Kalmuck ancestry, but he was also one-quarter Jewish. His maternal grandfather, Israel (Alexander) Blank, was a Ukrainian Jew who was later baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church.7A thorough-going internationalist, Lenin viewed ethnic or cultural loyalties with contempt. He had little regard for his own countrymen. „An intelligent Russian,” he once remarked, „is almost always a Jew or someone with Jewish blood in his veins.”8
    Critical Meetings
    In the Communist seizure of power in Russia, the Jewish role was probably critical.Two weeks prior to the Bolshevik „October Revolution” of 1917, Lenin convened a top secret meeting in St. Petersburg (Petrograd) at which the key leaders of the Bolshevik party’s Central Committee made the fateful decision to seize power in a violent takeover. Of the twelve persons who took part in this decisive gathering, there were four Russians (including Lenin), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and six Jews.9To direct the takeover, a seven-man „Political Bureau” was chosen. It consisted of two Russians (Lenin and Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), and four Jews (Trotsky, Sokolnikov, Zinoviev, and Kamenev).10 Meanwhile, the Petersburg (Petrograd) Soviet – whose chairman was Trotsky – established an 18-member „Military Revolutionary Committee” to actually carry out the seizure of power. It included eight (or nine) Russians, one Ukrainian, one Pole, one Caucasian, and six Jews.11 Finally, to supervise the organization of the uprising, the Bolshevik Central Committee established a five-man „Revolutionary Military Center” as the Party’s operations command. It consisted of one Russian (Bubnov), one Georgian (Stalin), one Pole (Dzerzhinsky), and two Jews (Sverdlov and Uritsky).12
    Contemporary Voices of Warning
    Well-informed observers, both inside and outside of Russia, took note at the time of the crucial Jewish role in Bolshevism. Winston Churchill, for one, warned in an article published in the February 8, 1920, issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald that Bolshevism is a „worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality.” The eminent British political leader and historian went on to write:13There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combatting Counter-Revolution [the Cheka] has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses
    Needless to say, the most intense passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people.David R. Francis, United States ambassador in Russia, warned in a January 1918 dispatch to Washington: „The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”14The Netherlands’ ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, made much the same point a few months later: „Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things.”15″The Bolshevik Revolution,” declared a leading American Jewish community paper in 1920, „was largely the product of Jewish thinking, Jewish discontent, Jewish effort to reconstruct.”16As an expression of its radically anti-nationalist character, the fledgling Soviet government issued a decree a few months after taking power that made anti-Semitism a crime in Russia. The new Communist regime thus became the first in the world to severely punish all expressions of anti-Jewish sentiment.17 Soviet officials apparently regarded such measures as indispensable. Based on careful observation during a lengthy stay in Russia, American-Jewish scholar Frank Golder reported in 1925 that „because so many of the Soviet leaders are Jews anti-Semitism is gaining [in Russia], particularly in the army [and] among the old and new intelligentsia who are being crowded for positions by the sons of Israel.”18
    Historians’ Views
    Summing up the situation at that time, Israeli historian Louis Rapoport writes:19Immediately after the [Bolshevik] Revolution, many Jews were euphoric over their high representation in the new government. Lenin’s first Politburo was dominated by men of Jewish originsUnder Lenin, Jews became involved in all aspects of the Revolution, including its dirtiest work. Despite the Communists’ vows to eradicate anti-Semitism, it spread rapidly after the Revolution – partly because of the prominence of so many Jews in the Soviet administration, as well as in the traumatic, inhuman Sovietization drives that followed. Historian Salo Baron has noted that an immensely disproportionate number of Jews joined the new Bolshevik secret police, the Cheka And many of those who fell afoul of the Cheka would be shot by Jewish investigators.The collective leadership that emerged in Lenin’s dying days was headed by the Jew Zinoviev, a loquacious, mean-spirited, curly-haired Adonis whose vanity knew no bounds.”Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka,” wrote Jewish historian Leonard Schapiro, „stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with, and possibly shot by, a Jewish investigator.”20 In Ukraine, „Jews made up nearly 80 percent of the rank-and-file Cheka agents,” reports W. Bruce Lincoln, an American professor of Russian history.21 (Beginning as the Cheka, or Vecheka) the Soviet secret police was later known as the GPU, OGPU, NKVD, MVD and KGB.)In light of all this, it should not be surprising that Yakov M. Yurovksy, the leader of the Bolshevik squad that carried out the murder of the Tsar and his family, was Jewish, as was Sverdlov, the Soviet chief who co-signed Lenin’s execution order.22Igor Shafarevich, a Russian mathematician of world stature, has sharply criticized the Jewish role in bringing down the Romanov monarchy and establishing Communist rule in his country. Shafarevich was a leading dissident during the final decades of Soviet rule. A prominent human rights activist, he was a founding member of the Committee on the Defense of Human Rights in the USSR.In Russophobia, a book written ten years before the collapse of Communist rule, he noted that Jews were „amazingly” numerous among the personnel of the Bolshevik secret police. The characteristic Jewishness of the Bolshevik executioners, Shafarevich went on, is most conspicuous in the execution of Nicholas II:23
    This ritual action symbolized the end of centuries of Russian history, so that it can be compared only to the execution of Charles I in England or Louis XVI in France. It would seem that representatives of an insignificant ethnic minority should keep as far as possible from this painful action, which would reverberate in all history. Yet what names do we meet? The execution was personally overseen by Yakov Yurovsky who shot the Tsar; the president of the local Soviet was Beloborodov (Vaisbart); the person responsible for the general administration in Ekaterinburg was Shaya Goloshchekin. To round out the picture, on the wall of the room where the execution took place was a distich from a poem by Heine (written in German) about King Balthazar, who offended Jehovah and was killed for the offense.In his 1920 book, British veteran journalist Robert Wilton offered a similarly harsh assessment:24The whole record of Bolshevism in Russia is indelibly impressed with the stamp of alien invasion. The murder of the Tsar, deliberately planned by the Jew Sverdlov (who came to Russia as a paid agent of Germany) and carried out by the Jews Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov and Yurovsky, is the act not of the Russian people, but of this hostile invader.In the struggle for power that followed Lenin’s death in 1924, Stalin emerged victorious over his rivals, eventually succeeding in putting to death nearly every one of the most prominent early Bolsheviks leaders – including Trotsky, Zinoviev, Radek, and Kamenev. With the passage of time, and particularly after 1928, the Jewish role in the top leadership of the Soviet state and its Communist party diminished markedly.
    Put To Death Without Trial
    For a few months after taking power, Bolshevik leaders considered bringing „Nicholas Romanov” before a „Revolutionary Tribunal” that would publicize his „crimes against the people” before sentencing him to death. Historical precedent existed for this. Two European monarchs had lost their lives as a consequence of revolutionary upheaval: England’s Charles I was beheaded in 1649, and France’s Louis XVI was guillotined in 1793.In these cases, the king was put to death after a lengthy public trial, during which he was allowed to present arguments in his defense. Nicholas II, though, was neither charged nor tried. He was secretly put to death – along with his family and staff – in the dead of night, in an act that resembled more a gangster-style massacre than a formal execution.Why did Lenin and Sverdlov abandon plans for a show trial of the former Tsar? In Wilton’s view, Nicholas and his family were murdered because the Bolshevik rulers knew quite well that they lacked genuine popular support, and rightly feared that the Russian people would never approve killing the Tsar, regardless of pretexts and legalistic formalities.For his part, Trotsky defended the massacre as a useful and even necesssary measure. He wrote:25The decision [to kill the imperial family] was not only expedient but necessary. The severity of this punishment showed everyone that we would continue to fight on mercilessly, stopping at nothing. The execution of the Tsar’s family was needed not only in order to frighten, horrify, and instill a sense of hopelessness in the enemy but also to shake up our own ranks, to show that there was no turning back, that ahead lay either total victory or total doom This Lenin sensed well.
    Historical Context
    In the years leading up to the 1917 revolution, Jews were disproportionately represented in all of Russia’s subversive leftist parties.26 Jewish hatred of the Tsarist regime had a basis in objective conditions. Of the leading European powers of the day, imperial Russia was the most institutionally conser-vative and anti-Jewish. For example, Jews were normally not permitted to reside outside a large area in the west of the Empire known as the „Pale of Settlement.”27However understandable, and perhaps even defensible, Jewish hostility toward the imperial regime may have been, the remarkable Jewish role in the vastly more despotic Soviet regime is less easy to justify. In a recently published book about the Jews in Russia during the 20th century, Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting the Bolshevik regime the „historic sin of the Jews.”28 She points, for example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps, and the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, „The Jews of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition.” In light of this record, Margolina offers a grim prediction:The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in the subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged Soviet power will be equated with Jewish power, and the furious hatred against the Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.If the past is any indication, it is unlikely that many Russians will seek the revenge that Margolina prophecies. Anyway, to blame „the Jews” for the horrors of Communism seems no more justifiable than to blame „white people” for Negro slavery, or „the Germans” for the Second World War or „the Holocaust.”
    Words of Grim Portent
    Nicholas and his family are only the best known of countless victims of a regime that openly proclaimed its ruthless purpose. A few weeks after the Ekaterinburg massacre, the newspaper of the fledgling Red Army declared:29Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies by the scores of hundreds, let them be thousands, let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritskii let there be floods of blood of the bourgeoisie – more blood, as much as possible.Grigori Zinoviev, speaking at a meeting of Communists in September 1918, effectively pronounced a death sentence on ten million human beings: „We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia’s inhabitants. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated.”30
    ‘The Twenty Million’
    As it turned out, the Soviet toll in human lives and suffering proved to be much higher than Zinoviev’s murderous rhetoric suggested. Rarely, if ever, has a regime taken the lives of so many of its own people.31Citing newly-available Soviet KGB documents, historian Dmitri Volkogonov, head of a special Russian parliamentary commission, recently concluded that „from 1929 to 1952 21.5 million [Soviet] people were repressed. Of these a third were shot, the rest sentenced to imprisonment, where many also died.”32Olga Shatunovskaya, a member of the Soviet Commission of Party Control, and head of a special commission during the 1960s appointed by premier Khrushchev, has similarly concluded: „From January 1, 1935 to June 22, 1941, 19,840,000 enemies of the people were arrested. Of these, seven million were shot in prison, and a majority of the others died in camp.” These figures were also found in the papers of Politburo member Anastas Mikoyan.Robert Conquest, the distinguished specialist of Soviet history, recently summed up the grim record of Soviet „repression” of it own people:34It is hard to avoid the conclusion that the post-1934 death toll was well over ten million. To this should be added the victims of the 1930-1933 famine, the kulak deportations, and other anti-peasant campaigns, amounting to another ten million plus. The total is thus in the range of what the Russians now refer to as ‘The Twenty Million’.”A few other scholars have given significantly higher estimates.35
    The Tsarist Era in Retrospect
    With the dramatic collapse of Soviet rule, many Russians are taking a new and more respectful look at their country’s pre-Communist history, including the era of the last Romanov emperor. While the Soviets – along with many in the West – have stereotypically portrayed this era as little more than an age of arbitrary despotism, cruel suppression and mass poverty, the reality is rather different. While it is true that the power of the Tsar was absolute, that only a small minority had any significant political voice, and that the mass of the empire’s citizens were peasants, it is worth noting that Russians during the reign of Nicholas II had freedom of press, religion, assembly and association, protection of private property, and free labor unions. Sworn enemies of the regime, such as Lenin, were treated with remarkable leniency.36During the decades prior to the outbreak of the First World War, the Russian economy was booming. In fact, between 1890 and 1913, it was the fastest growing in the world. New rail lines were opened at an annual rate double that of the Soviet years. Between 1900 and 1913, iron production increased by 58 percent, while coal production more than doubled.37 Exported Russian grain fed all of Europe. Finally, the last decades of Tsarist Russia witnessed a magnificent flowering of cultural life.Everything changed with the First World War, a catastrophe not only for Russia, but for the entire West.
    Monarchist Sentiment
    In spite of (or perhaps because of) the relentless official campaign during the entire Soviet era to stamp out every uncritical memory of the Romanovs and imperial Russia, a virtual cult of popular veneration for Nicholas II has been sweeping Russia in recent years.People have been eagerly paying the equivalent of several hours’ wages to purchase portraits of Nicholas from street vendors in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other Russian cities. His portrait now hangs in countless Russian homes and apartments. In late 1990, all 200,000 copies of a first printing of a 30-page pamphlet on the Romanovs quickly sold out. Said one street vendor: „I personally sold four thousand copies in no time at all. It’s like a nuclear explosion. People really want to know about their Tsar and his family.” Grass roots pro-Tsarist and monarchist organizations have sprung up in many cities.A public opinion poll conducted in 1990 found that three out of four Soviet citizens surveyed regard the killing of the Tsar and his family as a despicable crime.38 Many Russian Orthodox believers regard Nicholas as a martyr. The independent „Orthodox Church Abroad” canonized the imperial family in 1981, and the Moscow-based Russian Orthodox Church has been under popular pressure to take the same step, in spite of its long-standing reluctance to touch this official taboo. The Russian Orthodox Archbishop of Ekaterinburg announced plans in 1990 to build a grand church at the site of the killings. „The people loved Emperor Nicholas,” he said. „His memory lives with the people, not as a saint but as someone executed without court verdict, unjustly, as a sufferer for his faith and for orthodoxy.”39On the 75th anniversary of the massacre (in July 1993), Russians recalled the life, death and legacy of their last Emperor. In Ekaterinburg, where a large white cross festooned with flowers now marks the spot where the family was killed, mourners wept as hymns were sung and prayers were said for the victims.40Reflecting both popular sentiment and new social-political realities, the white, blue and red horizontal tricolor flag of Tsarist Russia was officially adopted in 1991, replacing the red Soviet banner. And in 1993, the imperial two-headed eagle was restored as the nation’s official emblem, replacing the Soviet hammer and sickle. Cities that had been re-named to honor Communist figures – such as Leningrad, Kuibyshev, Frunze, Kalinin, and Gorky – have re-acquired their Tsarist-era names. Ekaterinburg, which had been named Sverdlovsk by the Soviets in 1924 in honor of the Soviet-Jewish chief, in September 1991 restored its pre-Communist name, which honors Empress Catherine I.
    Symbolic Meaning
    In view of the millions that would be put to death by the Soviet rulers in the years to follow, the murder of the Romanov family might not seem of extraordinary importance. And yet, the event has deep symbolic meaning. In the apt words of Harvard University historian Richard Pipes:41The manner in which the massacre was prepared and carried out, at first denied and then justified, has something uniquely odious about it, something that radically distinguishes it from previous acts of regicide and brands it as a prelude to twentieth-century mass murder.Another historian, Ivor Benson, characterized the killing of the Romanov family as symbolic of the tragic fate of Russia and, indeed, of the entire West, in this century of unprecedented agony and conflict.The murder of the Tsar and his family is all the more deplorable because, whatever his failings as a monarch, Nicholas II was, by all accounts, a personally decent, generous, humane and honorable man.
    The Massacre’s Place in History
    The mass slaughter and chaos of the First World War, and the revolutionary upheavals that swept Europe in 1917-1918, brought an end not only to the ancient Romanov dynasty in Russia, but to an entire continental social order. Swept away as well was the Hohenzollern dynasty in Germany, with its stable constitutional monarchy, and the ancient Habsburg dynasty of Austria-Hungary with its multinational central European empire. Europe’s leading states shared not only the same Christian and Western cultural foundations, but most of the continent’s reigning monarchs were related by blood. England’s King George was, through his mother, a first cousin of Tsar Nicholas, and, through his father, a first cousin of Empress Alexandra. Germany’s Kaiser Wilhelm was a first cousin of the German-born Alexandra, and a distant cousin of Nicholas.More than was the case with the monarchies of western Europe, Russia’s Tsar personally symbolized his land and nation. Thus, the murder of the last emperor of a dynasty that had ruled Russia for three centuries not only symbolically presaged the Communist mass slaughter that would claim so many Russian lives in the decades that followed, but was symbolic of the Communist effort to kill the soul and spirit of Russia itself.
    About the Author

    Mark Weber was born and raised in Portland, Oregon. He studied history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the University of Munich, Portland State University and Indiana University (M.A., 1977).

    „Contrary to what so many good people – out of sheer terror of ‘Communism’ – think, Capitalism is not ‘free enterprise,’ an incentive for success, ‘a chance for all.’ Capitalism is trusts, speculation, parasitical usury. Capitalism is J. P. Morgan, Rothschild’s bank, ripping apart the nations like maddened swine. Capitalism is the Jewish frying pan in which culture is rendered down to the grease of money. Following it, as the night to day, is the thrice hotter Jewish fire of ‘Communism.'” William Striker

    Jews and Bolshevism

    Amongst themselves, the Jews are quite candid about their sympathy for and involvement in Bolshevism. On 4 April 1919 the Jewish Chronicle: „There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.” (Perhaps this explains why the Red Army uses a Jewish star as its symbol?) Probably the best-known exposé of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik coup d’état was by Sir Winston Churchill, writing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald of 8 February 1920. Churchill wrote „With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of leading figures are Jews. Moreover the principal inspiration and the driving power comes from Jewish leaders.” Communism was of course founded by Karl Marx whose grandfather was a rabbi by the name of Mordeccai. Marx was given his initial encouragement by a Communist-Zionist by the name of Moses Hess. As founder and editor of the Rheinische Zeitung, the main organ of leftist thought in Germany, he provided Karl Marx with his first important platform. Later, in Brussels, he collaborated with Marx on The German Ideology. It was Hess too who converted to Communism Friedrich Engels, the wealthy textiles magnate who later subsidised Marx from the profits of sweated labour in Britain and Germany. When the Bolsheviks overthrew the short-lived democratic government in Moscow and St. Petersburg in October 1917, it was a virtual Jewish coup d’état. The most prominent Jewish Commissar was Trotsky, real name Bronstein. He had been married by a rabbi in 1900, and whilst in exile in New York he had worked for Novy Mir, described in the Church Times (23 January 1925) as a „Yiddish newspaper.” The various reporters and diplomats who were there at the time of the „Revolution” have given evidence as to its Jewish nature. The widow of the Guardian’s correspondent Mrs. Ariadna Tyrkova-Williams wrote: „In the Soviet Republic all the committees and commissaries were filled with Jews.” The most detailed description of Jewish influence in the Bolshevik ‘revolution comes from Robert Wilton, the Russian correspondent of The Times. In 1920 he published a book in French, Les Derniers Jours des Romanofs, which gave the racial background of all the members of the Soviet government. (This does not appear in the later English translation, for some odd reason.) After the publication of this monumental work, Wilton was ostracised by the press, and he died in poverty in 1925. He reported that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party was made up as follows:

    NAME NATIONALITY
    Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
    Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
    Lourie (Larine) Jew
    Ouritski Jew
    Volodarski Jew
    Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) Jew
    Smidovitch Jew
    Sverdlof (Yankel) Jew
    Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
    Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
    Krylenko Russian
    Lounatcharski Russian

    „The Council of the People’s Commissars comprises the following:

    MINISTRY NAME NATIONALITY
    President Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
    Foreign Affairs Tchitcherine Russian
    Nationalities Djugashvili (Stalin) Georgian
    Agriculture Protian Armenian
    Economic Council Lourie (Larine) Jew
    Food Schlichter Jew
    Army & Navy Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
    State Control Lander Jew
    State Lands Kauffman Jew
    Works V. Schmidt Jew
    Social Relief E. Lelina (Knigissen) Jewess
    Public Instruction Lounatcharsky Russian
    Religions Spitzberg Jew
    Interior Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
    Hygiene Anvelt Jew
    Finance Isidore Goukovski Jew
    Press Volodarski Jew
    Elections Ouritski Jew
    Justice I. Steinberg Jew
    Refugees Fenigstein Jew
    Refugees (assist.) Savitch Jew
    Refugees (assist.) Zaslovski Jew

    „The following is the list of members of the Central Executive Committee:

    NAME NATIONALITY
    Sverdlov (president) Jew
    Avanessof (sec.) Armenian
    Bruno Lett
    Babtchinski Jew
    Bukharin Russian
    Weinberg Jew
    Gailiss Jew
    Ganzburg Jew
    Danichevski Jew
    Starck German
    Sachs Jew
    Scheinmann Jew
    Erdling Jew
    Landauer Jew
    Linder Jew
    Wolach Czech
    Dimanstein Jew
    Encukidze Georgian
    Ermann Jew
    Joffe Jew
    Karkline Jew
    Knigissen Jew
    Rosenfeldt (Kamenef) Jew
    Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
    Krylenko Russian
    KrassikofSachs Jew
    Kaprik Jew
    Kaoul Lett
    Ulyanov (lenin) Russian
    Latsis Jew
    Lander Jew
    Lounatcharski Russian
    Peterson Lett
    Peters Lett
    Roudzoutas Jew
    Rosine Jew
    Smidovitch Jew
    Stoutchka Lett
    Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
    Sosnovski Jew
    Skrytnik Jew
    Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
    Teodorovitch Jew
    Terian Armenian
    Ouritski Jew
    Telechkine Russian
    Feldmann Jew
    Froumkine Jew
    Souriupa Ukranian
    Tchavtchevadze Georgian
    Scheikmann Jew
    Rosental Jew
    Achkinazi Imeretian
    Karakhane Karaim (Jew)
    Rose Jew
    Sobelson (Radek) Jew
    Sclichter Jew
    Schikolini Jew
    Chklianski Jew
    Levine (Pravdine) Jew

    „The following is the list of members of the Extraordinary Commission of Moscow:

    NAME NATIONALITY
    Dzerjinski (president) Pole
    Peters (vice-president) Lett
    Chklovski Jew
    Kheifiss Jew
    Zeistine Jew
    Razmirovitch Jew
    Kronberg Jew
    Khaikina Jewess
    Karlson Lett
    Schaumann Jew
    Leontovitch Jew
    Jacob Goldine Jew
    Glaperstein Jew
    Kniggisen Jew
    Latzis Lett
    Schillenkuss Jew
    Janson Lett
    Rivkine Jew
    Antonof Russian
    Delafabre Jew
    Tsitkine Jew
    Roskirovitch Jew
    G. Sverdlof Jew
    Biesenski Jew
    Blioumkine Jew
    Alexandrevitch Russian
    I. Model Jew
    Routenberg Jew
    Pines Jew
    Sachs Jew
    Daybol Lett
    Saissoune Armenian
    Deylkenen Lett
    Liebert Jew
    Vogel German
    Zakiss Lett

    Although Lenin is described as a „Russian,” in fact he was a mixture of various nationalities. It is likely that he was one-quarter Russian, one-quarter German, one-quarter Jewish and at least one-quarter Kalmuck (Mongol), which accounts for his Mongol appearance. Various authorities allege that his wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya was a Jewess and that her family spoke Yiddish in the home. A report sent to the British government in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke, the Dutch consul in St. Petersburg, said that „Bolshevism is organised and worked by Jews.” The report was included in a pamphlet published as a government White Paper in April 1919 entitled Russia No. 1 (1919) A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. However, the pamphlet was quickly withdrawn and reissued with various excisions and alterations made. In the War Records Division of the United States National Archives there is filed a report from an American Intelligence operative in St. Petersburg. Under Record Group 20; Records of the American Expeditionary Forces Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, G2 Intelligence wrote, „The Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type.”
    Also in the U.S. National Archives are two telegrams sent by American diplomats in Russia. State Department document 861.00/1757 sent on 2 May 1918 by U.S. Consul Summers in Moscow relates, „Jews predominant in local Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population.” Document 861.00/2205 from Consul Caldwell in Vladivostock on 5 July 1918 describes, „Fifty per cent of Soviet government in each town consists of Jews of worst type.” In January, 1924, Lenin died from causes variously described as ‘a heart attack,’ brain hemorrhage’ and ‘syphilis.’ His comrades immediately began fighting amongst themselves to see who was to become his successor. A relative outsider, Joseph Stalin, came to the fore and purged all competition either by exiling or executing them. Since Stalin was not Jewish, yet nearly all his opponents were, it is often suggested that Stalin was anti-Semitic. This is far from the truth.
    Stalin had three wives, all of them Jewesses. The first was Ekaterina Svanidze who bore him one son, Jacob. His second wife was Kadya Allevijah. She bore him a son Vassili and a daughter Svetlana. His second wife died in mysterious circumstances, either by committing suicide or murdered by Stalin. His third wife was Rosa Kaganovich, the sister of Lazar Kaganovich, the head of Soviet industry. Stalin’s daughter (who in 1967 fled to the USA) then married Lazar’s son Mihail i.e. her step-mother’s nephew. Svetlana Stalin had a total of four husbands, three of them Jewish. Stalin’s vice-president Molotov was also married to a Jewess, whose brother, Sam Karp, runs an export business in Connecticut. Just to complicate things even more, the Molotov’s (half-Jewish) daughter also called Svetlana was engaged to be married to Stalin’s son Vassili. After the death of Stalin, his successors kept up the tradition, for a report in the B’nai B’rith Messenger relates: „To show that Russia treats its Jews well, Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev this week remarked at a reception at the Polish Embassy that not only he himself and Soviet President Klementi Voroshilov, but also half the members of the Praesidium have Jewish wives. Mr. Kruschev made this remark to Israeli Ambassador Joseph Avidar, who was amongst the guests.” (Kruschev’s wife was yet another Kaganovitch.) According to a report in The Canadian Jewish News of 13 November 1964 the present Soviet boss Leonid Brezhnev is married to a Jewess, and his children are brought up as Jews. There are a number of prominent Jews in the Soviet government, including Dimitri Dymshits in charge of industry, Lev Shapiro regional secretary of Birobidjan, and Yuri Andropov in charge of the secret police, the KGB. In fact, every secret police chief in Soviet history has been a Jew, from the first Uritsky to the most recent, the murderous Beria. A Jew is also in charge of the Soviet economy – Leonid Kantorovich. It is a well-known fact that the Bolsheviks were and are financed by Jewish interests in the West. At a Bolshevik celebration rally in New York’s Carnegie Hall on the night of 23 March 1917, a telegram of support from Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. was read out. The telegram was reprinted in the next morning’s New York Times. Schiff later tried to deny his involvement, but thirty years later his grandson John admitted in the New York Journal-American (3 February 1949) that the old man had sunk twenty million dollars into the Bolshevik cause. Another Western bankers who poured funds into Bolshevik Russia was Olaf Ashberg of the Stockholm Nia Banken. He remained the Soviets’ paymaster until the late 1940s. The London Evening Standard of 6 September 1948 reported a visit by Ashberg to Switzerland „for secret meetings with Swiss government officials and banking executives. Diplomatic circles describe Mr. Ashberg as the ‘Soviet banker’ who advanced large sums to Lenin and Trotsky in 1917. At the time of the revolution, Mr. Ashberg gave Trotsky money to form and equip the first unit of the Red Army.” The Bolsheviks also received assistance from Armand Hammer, who still commutes back and forward between New York and Moscow to take care of his business interests in both communities. Hammer’s Occidental Oil Company is at the moment building a 1600 mile chemicals pipeline in southern Russia. He is also on such good terms with the Soviets that he personally arranges for Soviet art galleries to lend paintings to America. Another American-based businessman to help out the Soviet economy is Michael Fribourg, who owns the massive Continental Grain Company. Together with the Louis Dreyfus Corporation, these Jewish speculators were able to buy up vast quantities of cheap American grain in 1972, sell it to the Soviets at a vast profit, and collect an export subsidy from the U.S. taxpayer. In every other East European country, it is exactly the same story: In Hungary a Communist revolution was staged in 1919, instigated by the Jew Bela Kun (Cohen). During the three month regime, the country was turned upside down in a reign of murder and terror. Here again, the government was composed almost entirely of Jews. And it was this factor which brought about the regime’s downfall, as the ordinary Hungarians detested Jewish dictatorship. Kun was deposed and fled to the Soviet Union, where he became chief of the secret police, the Cheka, in southern Russia. It was not until 1945 that the Jews were able to regain control. Three Russian Jews were installed as the ruling triumvirate, Matyas Rakosi (Rosencranz), Erno Gero (Singer) and Zoltan Vas. Both Rakosi and Gero had been members of Kun’s bloody government. In Germany, the Jews also tried to take over there in the chaos that followed the First World War. Aided by funds from the Soviet Ambassador Joffe, Rosa Luxemburg’s Spartacus Bund attempted to overthrow the government. The revolt was quelled and its leaders Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht executed. The post-war dictator of Roumania, Anna Pauker, was the daughter of a Bucharest kosher butcher. For a time she earned her living teaching Hebrew. her father and brother now live in Israel. Although Tito was the only non-Jewish dictator behind the Iron Curtain in the late 1940s, he was tutored by the Jew Mosa Pijade. According to John Gunther in Behind the Iron Curtain, „He is Tito’s mentor… Whatever ideological structure Tito may have, he got it from the shrewd old man.” Moscow’s puppet government in Czechoslovakia in the late 1940s was run by another Jew, Rudolph Slansky. In Poland too, Jews occupied virtually every position of authority in the post-war Communist regime. Prominent among these were Minc, Skryesewski, Modzelewski and Berman. Jacob Berman gradually eclipsed the others until he became supreme dictator by himself. Also, Gomulka’s wife was a Jewess. Even in China, Soviet Jews were at work helping Mao Tse Tung. High up in the Political Department of the Red Army in China were W. N. Levitschev and J. B. Gamarnik.

    • @ucenicul
      rolul lor, in timp, se intinde atat inaintea acestui eveniment cat si in cele de dupa. Revolutia engleza, franceza, romana, caderea lui Bonaparte,etc. toate au avut aportul nepretuit al evreilor. Inclusiv al 2-lea RM a fost provocat de ei. Din pacate lumea cunoaste doar istoria asa cum a invata-o la scoala si care in cea mai mare parte este o minciuna.

  3. geoana n’are sanse, e prea slab pregatit, ca sa fie dezastrul complet base mai sta o tura:(..pdap obama daca te uiti bine seamana mai mult cu akenathon:))

    • @alfa
      „prostanacul” e ideal. Ei n-au nevoie de oameni destepti ci de executanti, de oameni slab pregatiti dar cu ambitii personale. base n-are nici o sansa. Francmasonii i-au spus public ca isi retrag ajutorul. Vei vedea ca dezastrul adevarat de abia acum incepe. indiferent cine va fi ales. uita-te la americani ca sa intelegi cum poate fi distrusa pana si cea mai democratica tara din lume.

      • dar noi, poporul, nu mai putem face chiar nimic? o intrebare care poate parea normala dar la noi, unde jumate de populatie a fost imbecilizata, manelizata, tiganizata, nu-si mai are rostul

  4. @ mucenicul Cred ca ai dreptate.Nu imi place Geoana,sper sa nu fie in carti la stii tu cine ,ca asta le-ar face sigur pe plac ,ba si-ar mai da si silinta.Oricum cel care iese sigur e un vandut.Daca apare un om cinstit pe post de candidat credibil il mananca astia de viu.

    • @ elena
      ideea era ca in toate tarile in care au loc alegeri anul asta si anul urmator mecanismul va fi acelasi. omul de baza al lui Rothschild in alegerea presedintilor este George Soros. Si Romania are un candidat preferat de acestia, dupa parerea mea el este Geoana.Castigatorul alegerilor va fi un om care se declara social-democrat dar care este de fapt un adept al ideologiei comuniste. Iar Geoana este. De fapt el insusi s-a identificat cu Obama. Asa ca, indiferent cu cine veti vota va iesi cine trebuie. Sa dea Dumnezeu sa gresesc eu dar nu prea cred.

  5. Nu prea inteleg de ce egiptenii l-au aclamat pe tipul asta ca pe Tutankamon ca nu are nimic comun cu el.

  6. pentru fixarea lui Obama la casa alba s-au cheltuit bani multi.Manipularea populatiei a inceput masiv cu vreo 3 ani inainte de alegeri.S-au difuzai filme in care presedinti ai USA erau negri ( Armaghedon , Al cincilea element etc ), s-a realizat chiar un serial despre viata la casa alba in care presedinte era tot un negru,serial care a durat peste 2 ani si s-a terminat cu 2 saptamani inainte de alegeri.Unii spun ca personajul principal care avea dealtfel functia de presedinte avea la mana aceeasi bratara ca si a lui Obama.Ce sa mai vorbim…totul s-a facut din timp si va fi in detrimentul USA si al intregii lumi.Se observa ( pentru cine are ochi sa vada ) cum aparatul legislativ se schimba in majoritatea tarilor,legi care alta data erau considerate un pericol la adresa umanitatii,acum sunt deja normale.De ce este nevoie de schimbarea aparatului legislativ? Nu cumva cineva isi pregateste toate parghiile pentru ceva anume si vrea sa o faca sa arate legal? Odata ce chiar de la inceput Obama a acceptat ca poemul citit la investire , sa fie citit de un pastor homosexual , arata clar pe mana cui marge tipul.Oricum tipul scade la greu in sondaje si asta arata ca daca Obama are ceva de facut pentru stapanii lui trebuie sa o faca in candidatura asta , ca alta nu mai prinde.Probabil ca trebuiesa ne asteptam la niste lucruri de rahat de la individul asta.

    • @spellmaker
      da si la noi cred ca se va schimba la alegerile actuale. si exista cineva care se aseamana cu Obama (fizic-doar ca inaltime), care are aceleasi afinitati ideologice, e prieten cu John Biden, are consilieri de campanie americani si il are pe Gusa sef de campanie. Curios, dar Gusa s-a aflat intotdeauna in tabara castigatorului, la alegeri. Nu cred ca e doar intamplator acest fapt.

Lasă un răspuns

Completează mai jos detaliile despre tine sau dă clic pe un icon pentru autentificare:

Logo WordPress.com

Comentezi folosind contul tău WordPress.com. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Poză Twitter

Comentezi folosind contul tău Twitter. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Fotografie Facebook

Comentezi folosind contul tău Facebook. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Fotografie Google+

Comentezi folosind contul tău Google+. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Conectare la %s